WHY THE STANDARD FOR TSA SCREENERS TO TOUCH YOUR BODY SHOULD BE “PROBABLE CAUSE” AND NOT “REASONABLE SUSPICION”

A Brief Overview
By Bradley W. Pierce, Esq.

Texas and many other states are considering legislation to outlaw gropings by the TSA without probable cause.
Some critics of the legislation (and even some supporters) have suggested that the standard required to perform those
invasive searches should be “reasonable suspicion” and not “probable cause.”  “After all,” they argue, “law enforcement officers are permitted to frisk people on the basis of reasonable suspicion, why can’t TSA screeners?”  This paper briefly answers that question.

Download Article Here: Why the Standard for TSA Screeners to Touch Your Body Should Be Probable Cause and not Reasonable Suspicion

Share this post

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed
  • Share this post on Delicious
  • StumbleUpon this post
  • Share this post on Digg
  • Tweet about this post
  • Share this post on Mixx
  • Share this post on Technorati
  • Share this post on Facebook
  • Share this post on NewsVine
  • Share this post on Reddit
  • Share this post on Google
  • Share this post on LinkedIn
One Response to "WHY THE STANDARD FOR TSA SCREENERS TO TOUCH YOUR BODY SHOULD BE “PROBABLE CAUSE” AND NOT “REASONABLE SUSPICION”"
  1. Reply TSA Tyranny » TSA Tyranny Withdraws Support from House Version of TSA Anti-Groping Bill (HB41) June 25, 2011 19:39 pm

    [...] insisted on by Speaker Joe Straus would establish that TSA agents be permitted to exercise a “reasonable suspicion” standard of review (a standard created by case law for police officers which is applied by far [...]

Leave your response